Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Symbols and Religious Freedom Feb04

More than 3000 years ago in polytheistic Assyria, it was a privilege of respectable women to wear a headscarf to confirm their virtue and status in society. It was neither a religious symbol nor a fashion statement and was an established social garment for women long before Prophet Mohamed (570AD). The Koran, like the Bible, explicitly states that the ‘Hijab’(headscarf) minimises the risk of arousing desire and lust in men. Only some of the 500 million Muslim women worldwide wear headscarves and those who do are expressing an integral and private part of their cultural identity and tradition.

 

We uphold and respect individual freedom in our multi-faith, multicultural, democratic societies. The freedom to assemble, to have political opinions, to worship, to dress and to live peacefully in a manner that we choose is essential. Our freedom is only limited by statute if the consequent action offends, injures, denies or imposes on others. Some of us wear lapel badges to declare our political affiliation or support for our favourite sporting team. These are public expressions of our private beliefs that may arouse a public reaction. If we allow people to do this without fuss, then why should we prevent others who wish to wear a cross, a headscarf, a turban or a skullcap if these symbols express their private beliefs?

 

Laws banning headscarves are discriminatory not just against certain cultural traditions but against Islam itself. French secularism cannot exclude the second pillar of French nationhood that champions “Liberty, Equality & Fraternity”. What does “liberty” mean for French citizens who choose to wear a hijab without provocation? What does “equality” mean for French citizens professing Islam? What does “fraternity” mean for immigrant communities trying hard to co-exist peacefully with the host community without losing their cultural identity?

 

The majority of people value the plurality of faith, culture, tradition and ethnicity and cherish individual freedom within a democratic political system. We should encourage compassion, tolerance and mutual respect so that, together, we can ensure continued peace and prosperity in Europe.


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000