Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

No Smoke without Cash Mar05

 

A part of taxes paid by European citizens is used by the EU to subsidise EU tobacco farmers. EU Member States and the EU use more tax revenue to advertise the ill effects of smoking. European smokers pay heavy taxes to buy their cigarettes and tobacco companies spend taxable profits to advertise so that we, especially our children, will smoke more!

 

Are we mad? Do we like to pay taxes that can be wasted by our governments and the EU in this way? Why do we ban smoking in public places and then allow our national health systems, funded by our taxes, to spend a vast amount to treat smokers for smoking related diseases?  Should we accept the unnecessary death of 500,000 Europeans each year from smoking related diseases?

 

Over 100,000 tobacco farmers in the EU (60,000 in Greece, 27,000 in Italy and the rest in France and Spain) use buying syndicates to claim and receive €1bn in annual subsidy from the EU Common Agricultural Fund! This subsidy supports the livelihood of farmers, their families and their employees. The subsidy is allegedly shared with local politicians and national political parties to reward them for their sustained lobby in Brussels to ensure continuation of annual payments. Whilst the EU is aware of the discrepancy between subsidy claims and true production, it justifies the subsidy by highlighting the political instability of border regions e.g. northern Greece and the Balkan states.

 

Tobacco, like coffee and cocoa, is a cash crop grown in many developing countries. The growers earn little and the prices have not risen for years. A typical tobacco grower in Africa or Asia receives about €2 per Kilo for his leaf realising a profit of €1. As 1Kg of leaf produces 1000 cigarettes, the cost of the leaf in a pack of 20 cigarettes is a mere €0.20 just 3% of the retail price! The UK Government’s tax, including VAT, is 80% and the remaining 17% covers production cost, advertising expense, marketing & distribution costs as well as the profits of manufacturers and distributors. The UK Government collects €4 tax from every pack of cigarettes sold in Britain at €5 whilst the poor African or Asian tobacco grower receives €0.20!

 

The 25 EU Member States collect €55bn each year from taxes on sale of tobacco products. Clearly, no EU Member State Government will be “tough on tobacco sales” as so much revenue flows into their coffers without much public protest. Every public campaign against smoking strengthens the public perception that smoking is anti-social. The smokers are reminded that smoking causes death every time they open a packet of cigarettes. Non-smokers can be unfriendly to them in places without clearly marked areas for smoking. Pharmaceutical companies have profited from producing anti-smoking treatments. Sadly, the weed is addictive for them and they cannot always kick the habit!

 

If tobacco production and consumption are economic burdens on non-smoking European citizens then why do we subsidise European growers when tobacco is grown without subsidy and cost to us in developing countries? If the subsidy is to maintain political stability in sensitive regions of Greece, Italy, France and Spain then why is the EU not offering a similar subsidy to farmers in Northern Ireland for their crops? The EU should encourage free enterprise and a culture of self-reliance. The EU should invest in re-training and re-deployment of labour to encourage a shift of employment from unproductive labour intensive enterprises to high tech enterprises producing value added goods. In any case, why should heavily taxed non-smoking European citizens subsidise Greek, Italian, French and Spanish tobacco growers who pay so much less in taxes to smoke in their countries?

 

Would the EU subsidise marijuana if Northern Irish farmers switched from potatoes to growing this weed in their greenhouses?  Would it allow the sale of cigarettes containing marijuana if they are highly taxed? Would such a decriminalisation of marijuana put the drug dealers out of business and help reduce crime on our streets?


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000