Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Reform EU Healthcare Mar05

 

The EU has an average of 7.89% of GDP for health expenditure. Croatia, Czech Republic and Slovenia can match this but other new members spend far less. Poland's figure is 3.8%. The EU of 25, with almost double the population of the USA, spends about $100bn on pharmaceuticals whilst the USA spends $200bn.

 

Healthcare is highly regulated in almost every European country to this day. Each EU Member State has its own system of regulating research and development of new drugs, manufacture, product safety, national registration of the product, advertising, wholesale and retail distribution. The Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) in the USA is a single agency that offers approval of new drugs for sale in the large US market. The European Medical Evaluation Agency (EMEA) is the EU equivalent and is aiming to do the same for the EU. EMEA needs to respond more quickly and liberalise its requirements on product advertising as well as the time period for data and patent protection.

 

How can the EU reform its healthcare system to offer a minimum level of quality and service for its citizens?

 

Information

 

a) Authentic information based on science is essential and it must be at the centre of a European Healthcare. Information about research and development of new drugs should be in the public domain. The public needs to know the range of diseases for which drug cures are sought and the level of public investment that is offered to EU research institutions.

 

b) EMEA’s period for data and patent protection of new drugs must match the conditions of the FDA in the USA to ensure that pharmaceutical companies do not divert their investment in R&D to the USA.

 

c) Patients need access to information on diseases, doctors, hospitals and the range of facilities available to them. The family doctor is the first point of contact for all patients and these doctors need internet databank access to identify the availability of consultants and hospital beds. The patient cannot continue to rely on publications that are available at doctors' surgeries and the enclosed leaflet in the product package. There should be adequate information on the internet that is authenticated by EMEA.

 

 

Skill Utilisation

 

a) Most family doctors are unable to perform diagnostic tests and hospital references cost time and money. .

 

b) The pharmacist can perform diagnostic tests and treat minor ailments thereby saving substantial costs for national health budgets.

 

c) Doctors, surgeons and nurses, supported by qualified administrators should determine the running of each hospital.

 

 

Uninterrupted supply of medicines

 

The current system of pricing for medication is based on each Member State negotiating directly with the major pharmaceutical manufacturers. The chargeable price is determined by the size of the nation’s health budget and value of sales to the manufacturer. This results in substantial price differences whereby Greece, Spain and Portugal pay far less than UK, Germany and Scandinavian countries. This leads to parallel trade i.e. imports from Greece and Spain into UK and Germany. Such trade erodes the margins of pharmaceutical manufacturers forcing them to impose supply quotas to minimise parallel trade!

 

The EU should have a fixed “EU nominal price” for essential pharmaceutical products i.e the price payable by the full-line wholesaler in every EU Member State to the pharmaceutical manufacturer. With such a scheme in place, each Member State can negotiate directly with the manufacturer the reimbursement to suit its national requirements. This scheme eliminates parallel trade and results in direct savings to national health budgets. Also, it prevents erosion of the profits of the pharmaceutical manufacturers allowing them to offer lower prices and continue their investment in Research & Development of new drugs.

 

EU health insurance

 

With increasing expectations of higher healthcare and mobility of European citizens across the EU for work or leisure, it is essential that EU Member States begin a programme of shifting the burden of risk of healthcare to private insurers. The hospitals, doctors, nurses and health infrastructure can continue to be state owned but through tax relief the population can be offered the opportunity to secure private medical cover. This can be done over time for different age groups. This transition will allow patients to choose hospitals, doctors and treatment forcing private sector discipline on state owned hospitals as they compete with private hospitals. This will improve the quality of healthcare and facilitate the use of a EU HEALTHCARD that will permit any EU citizen to receive medical care in any part of the EU.


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000