Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Living with Chemicals Jan04

 

DUST, mites, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, nitrous oxide, waste particulate matter and a range of chemicals contaminate our environment. Fluorocarbons and CO2 emissions have led to atmospheric degradation and global warming. When we breathe the air, wash your face with soap, brush teeth, drink water, eat Cornflakes, wear any dress, spray cologne or apply lipstick, the body will need to deal immediately with a range of chemicals that are inhaled, ingested or applied to the skin. 

 

The world production of industrial chemicals has risen from 1 million tons in 1930 to 400m tons today. Some 100,000 chemicals are registered in the EU market with about 10,000 marketed in volumes greater than 10 tons and a further 20,000 at 1-10 tons. Apart from affecting food and drink, these chemicals are released directly into the environment from industry, agriculture, vehicles, aircraft, ships, incinerators and tobacco smoke. A wide range of industrial goods, domestic equipment, household products, vehicles, plastic products, plant and machinery contain chemicals that are a potential risk during use and on disposal.

 

Chemicals that are not readily broken down by our bodies (vP=very persistent), those that accumulate in living tissue (vB=very bioaccumulative) and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are of particular concern as once inhaled or ingested they can lead to harm that is not easily detected in the early stages. Some examples include: polar bears, seals and dolphins suffering decreased immune system function due to the immuno-toxic effects of accumulated PCBs; dog-whelk populations decimated because of tributyltin used in antifouling paint applied to ship hulls to prevent organisms growing on the bottom of boats; UK birds of prey populations have fallen as a result of DDT, which causes eggshells to thin. 

 

The European Union defines persistent and bioaccumulative chemical pollutants as Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and the European Commission has published its proposal on Registration. Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH) to cover testing of these chemicals for toxicity, registration, publication of data and labelling to warn the consumer of the dangers. The European Parliament will debate proposal this year but it is difficult to devise legislation covering a vast number of chemicals, produced in varying quantities and almost always used in combination with numerous thers in final products that are marketed. Laws will have to apply equally to products imported from outside the EU. 

 

Finally, consideration must be given to not only the safety of the chemical per se but also the safety when combined with a cocktail of chemicals. Testing for toxicity of thousands of chemicals will involve hundreds of thousands of experiments. Tests for carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic to reproduction and other actions require use of laboratory animals and the animal welfare lobby is very concerned about the use of millions of such animals (rats, mice, rabbits). Furthermore, these additional tests will precipitate a huge cost (£20bn over 10 years) for the chemical manufacturers and importers. The EU will incur a substantial cost in setting up the European Chemical Agency to monitor and record the data for product registration.

 

 


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000