Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Killing for Dishonour Oct03

I condemn, without reservation, any violence or murderous act by anyone for ‘honour’ of family, religion or social tradition.

 

The murder of Heshu Yones by her father Abdalla Yones has been the subject of articles in our national press by Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Amir Taheri, Lina Das and Gitangeli Sapra. These authors analyse the reasons behind such action and philosophise on contributory factors based on religion or ethnic background.

 

Yasmine Alibhai-Brown (The Mail) believes, I think incorrectly, that “such crimes occur mainly in uneducated families”. Lina Das (The Mail) claims that a girl is “stained” if she is involved sexually with a boy with a different religion and cultural background. Such action is perceived to defy her family and community. Gitangeli Sapra (The Sunday Times) sights family honour, jealousy and financial greed as some reasons for males in a family to intimidate a daughter or young bride. Amir Taheri (The Independent) highlights the unacceptable deficiency of Muslim journalists and intellectuals in raising the issue of ‘honour’ killings.  

 

Progressive Muslims such as Queen Rania of Jordan ask why there is such a negative perception of Muslim women in the western media? Such a question can be extended to cover Hindu, Sikh and other Asian women. Social tradition in most Asian and Arab societies perpetuates the virtue of virginity, respect for family blessing, approval for marriage and fidelity in marriage. Pre-marital sex and marriage to one with a different religion are discouraged. Such Victorian values were not uncommon in Britain many years ago, including the hesitancy of Catholics to marry Protestants. Any divergence from such expectations is perceived as a challenge to the authority and sanctity of the family and the community. Parents uphold these principles in order to maintain their status within their community.

 

Therefore, social and religious inflexibility, inherent in immigrant communities, act as serious impediments for the young immigrants as they meet their British peers enjoying freedom of thought and action. The public perception is that ‘honour’ killings occur only in Muslim families. This is not true as many Hindu, Sikh, Chinese and Arab families also face the same problem. The ‘dishonour’ inflicted on the family is a characteristic of social tradition – it is not a breach of religious belief. Neither Islam nor Hinduism advocate or condone ‘honour’ killings. Religion, social tradition and cultural diversity are often used by the guilty to justify their action.

 

The impact of western culture and lifestyle is most significant for immigrants from Asian villages. Their children experience a dramatic change and difficult challenge in school when they face their peers. They feel restricted to their school, mosque or home as their parents, speaking little or no English, live in poor houses and are mainly unemployed. Insecurity, fear and financial limitations result in congregation of immigrants in generally the poorest part of towns and cities. This isolation reinforces social traditions and enhances the influence of local religious or community leaders. These conditions prevail in northern cities where there are large numbers from rural areas in Pakistan and Bangladesh.

 

Some of these immigrant families are unable to cope with their children asserting their independence of thought and action. These families fail to realise that lifestyle of every immigrant family changes with each generation. They must accept that their children must be free to seize opportunities for higher education and employment away from home to escape poverty and isolation. Such freedom for their children can only help the family and it need not threaten their religious belief or culture.

 

We must find practical ways of assisting these families, especially from rural India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to face this problem of adapting to a new way of life. We must encourage them to break away from their isolation and help them integrate better with the host community. In this way these immigrants will acquire the linguistic skills and build a social confidence that will allow them to be self-reliant and make a positive contribution to the life of their local community. Only then we shall succeed in eliminating the hideous crime of  ‘killing for dishonour’.  


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000