Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

 

India and the EU May03

India and Europe are linked by half a century of common values that unite the two regions as the world’s largest democratic state and the largest democratic union of independent states, respectively. India has more registered electors than the EU’s entire population and yet it can boast free and fair elections for five decades, a free press, an independent judiciary, a non-political army and a commitment to remain a secular state to sustain democracy.

 

India was the first country outside the EU to establish its embassy in Brussels in 1962 to represent India vis-à-vis the European Community. The benefit of this early association was limited, owing to India’s economic policy of focusing on internal market orientation of import substitution. However, there was greater success on the political front as India led the group of non-aligned nations and collaborated effectively with the EU in the UN and the Middle East and in developing regional trade links throughout Asia through ASEAN.

 

India’s balance of payments crisis in the summer of 1991 exposed the weakness of its economy. India had no choice but to open its economy to privatisation and competition. It had to roll back the frontiers of the state and introduce economic liberalisation that led to GDP growth of 6.5 per cent per annum for the period 1992-2001. The tenth five-year plan for 2002-2007 estimates annual economic growth at an average of 8 per cent.

 

25 per cent  of India’s exports are to the EU whilst only 1.3 per cent of EU exports go to India. India-EU trade, in both directions, could be substantially improved if agreements are reached on bilateral trade conditions e.g. quality standards, social and environmental welfare of workers, reduction of customs duties, quota limitations, sluggish bureaucracy and poor infrastructure. Overall, India attracts less direct foreign investment than China. Despite India's linguistic and social advantages, foreign investors (especially US multinationals) prefer to manufacture in China. India must address this problem!

 

India must dismantle the jungle of bureaucracy that cripples its economy to gain the advantage from China. Its bureaucracy devalues labour, wastes financial resources, breeds corruption and discourages domestic and foreign investors. Privatisation of state owned companies, use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) and electronic communication for all government and private business, the opening of transport infrastructure to domestic and foreign private investment and outsourcing federal and state government services would unleash resources, human and financial, that would energise the Indian economy by creating a huge demand for goods and labour. Industry and business will then seize the opportunities to invest to produce goods and offer services to a population with increasing disposable incomes.

 

In June 2004, the EU will expand to be a union of 25 countries with a population of 450 million. How can India expand its trade with the EU to exploit the markets of the less developed accession countries that will need a wide range of goods and services?

India has so far lacked effective access to important Asian multilateral forums like the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) and the Asia-Europe Summit Meetings (ASEM) that play an increasingly important role in co-ordinating national policies in the age of globalisation. Pro-active professional dialogue at these forums, political meetings between India-EU Parliamentary Industry Committees and technical meetings with relevant European Commission officials can be the starting points for increasing the co-operation between India and Europe.

 

The Indian Chamber of Industry and Commerce, like the American Chamber of Commerce, should establish in Brussels a link with the European Parliament that can act as the venue for contact, dialogue, trade negotiation and identification of entrepreneurs interested in India-EU trade. This link will offer an opportunity to Indian businessmen to meet European Parliamentarians, European industrialists and European Commission officials. Such a forum will enhance India’s trade with the EU. It would also allow Indian businessmen in the UK to explore investment possibilities in the EU. I shall be delighted to be a co-founder of such a project.


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000