Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Gujuratis in politics Aug03

There is a large Gujarati population in Brent East and other North West London constituencies. Most Gujaratis believe in a liberal market economy based on free enterprise, law & order, family values, concern for high quality of education, health and social services. Many of the resident electors are successful businessmen, industrialists, professionals and community workers. A good number are councillors and have rendered years of service to their communities.

 

So why do Gujaratis vote Labour? Why do the Conservative and Liberal parties not have a fair representation of ethnic parliamentarians? Do most ethnic constituents abstain from voting? If so, why? In seats such as Brent East, there are more than 20,000 ethnic voters out of a total of 58,000. This should give the ethnic voters substantial influence in selecting a candidate of their choice and in determining the policies that can bring benefit to the area.

 

 Why have the major political parties not chosen Gujarati candidates to be their prospective parliamentary candidates in winnable seats for Westminster and Brussels? Why is selection for winnable seats still the prerogative of the ‘kingmakers’ in national offices of the political parties?

 

It is alleged that the Labour selects its candidates from its national party office whilst the Conservative Party gives substantial autonomy to its constituency associations. Whilst the Conservatives have succeeded in selecting more ethnic candidates in winnable positions for Brussels for the 2004 European elections, the Liberals have failed to select any ethnic candidate in a winnable position for Westminster and Brussels.

 

British political parties have not succeeded in ‘connecting’ with ethnic minorities. Many reasons have been suggested by political analysts:-

  1. They fear that a greater number of ethnic parliamentarians, including cabinet ministers, may upset many indigenous party members.

  2. The parties have failed to use effectively currently elected ethnic parliamentarians (MPs and MEPs) in establishing appropriate links with ethnic communities.

  3. It is alleged that there is discrimination in the selection process resulting in ethnic candidates gaining nominations for non-winnable seats only.

  4. There are not sufficient numbers of young men and women with appropriate academic and working backgrounds coming forward for selection.

  5. Whilst there are a number of Councillors in local government, they are either too old or not suitably qualified for parliament.

 

Ethnic participation in British politics can only be realised if members of the ethnic minorities take an interest in politics and vote without fail at elections. Gujaratis must join local constituency associations of political parties that offer them the best policies. They should participate in association activities, volunteer as officers and eventually put their names forward for selection as candidates for Parliament in Westminster and Brussels. They must choose prominent members in their community to represent them and young professionals and business people – both men and women – must be at the forefront of such an active campaign to be involved in politics.

 

Ethnic participation in British politics must be based on merit. Aspiring ethnic politicians must involve themselves fully in the activities of their local constituency associations. They must connect with and encourage all constituents, including ethnic minorities, to come out and vote at elections. They must do this by knocking on doors and getting themselves known locally. They must work and serve their community – all constituents irrespective of class, creed or religion. Only in this way can they claim to be true citizens and representatives of their area.

 

If sufficient people from ethnic minorities take an active part in local constituency politics and most of the others vote in local and national elections, there will be a sea change in British politics. When will these major British political parties begin to realise the potential of the ethnic vote? I hope the Conservative Party will take the lead so that success in London and beyond can reverse the majority against them in Westminster and allow them to win the next General Election!


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000