Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

A Fair Tax for All May05

 

Taxes finance public expenditure. All of us pay taxes, especially indirect taxes on what we buy. International trade, internet trading, transfer pricing by multinational companies and use of tax heavens for anonymous deposits pose great difficulties for governments to impose and collect taxes.

 

National tax systems in the EU are unnecessarily complex. In the UK, there are three rates for income tax: 10%; 22% and 40%. For investment income, the equivalent rates are 10%, 20% and 40%, except for dividends, where they are 0%, 0% and 32.5%. On top of this, there is a parallel, though different, system of income tax by another name – National Insurance (NI). Capital gains are taxed in a complicated way with 39 potentially effective rates, depending on the type of asset sold and how long it has been owned. Interacting with all these tax rates are, of course, numerous allowances and exemptions.

 

Allowances and exemptions in current tax systems encourage unnecessary expenditure resulting in erosion of profits, taxes and dividends. Highly paid executives benefit disproportionately at the expense of both shareholders and taxpayers as they claim allowances for expensive company houses, luxury cars, first class air travel and tax-protected bonuses that vary significantly. These allowances neither promote corporate efficiency nor savings that can help increase capital, share value and dividends. For shareholders, there is no comparable relation between sales turnover, cost of sales, profits and dividends.

 

How can we have a fair tax for all that will minimise tax avoidance?

 

EU governments should employ a system of “Classified Turnover Tax” (CTT) for different classifications of employers and employees. Employers would incur tax on Corporate Sales Turnover (CST) and employees would be taxed on Taxable Personal Income (TPI) above the level of Untaxed Personal Income (UPI). Earned income, investment income and capital gain would be taxed equally as income. Exceptionally, inherited assets and capital gain on sale of owner occupied homes would be exempt from tax. Indirect tax on purchase of goods and services (VAT) would be an option for governments, especially to cover trans-national internet trade. 

 

The CTT system would be as follows:-

For all employees including self-employed:-

UPI 012:- Income tax 0% for income up to £12,500 for age 0-60 years old

UPI 020:- Income tax 0% for income up to £25,000 for age 60 and more

TPI 100:- Income tax 20% for salary up to £100,000

TPI 200:- Income tax 30% for salary up to £200,000

TPI 300:- Income tax 40% for salary exceeding £200,000

For employers:-

Tax rates for Corporate Sales Turnover (CST) to be fixed for each sector:-

CST (A):- Manufacturing Industry

CST (B):- Farming

CST (C):- Wholesale distribution

CST (D):- Retail distribution

CST (E):- Catering & Cleaning Services

CST (F):- Financial services, including banking

CST (G):- Football Clubs

CST (H):- Airlines

Etc.

 

A single tax on sales turnover of a business according to its classified sector would leave the rest of sales revenue as profit to cover cost of sales, capital investment and dividends. With no allowances or exemptions, businesses would be forced to minimise their cost of sales by efficient management of resources in order to offer maximum dividends to existing shareholders and attract new investors. Shareholders and new investors will be able to compare cost of sales of similar businesses to assess management performance of executive directors and managers. Multinationals and internet traders will not be able to use transfer pricing or tax heavens to evade taxes as sales turnover will be taxed in the country where the sale is transacted. Citizens will feel encouraged to insist that all sales are recorded as higher tax revenue collected by their government will assist funding of public services that benefit them

.

Governments of EU Member States will find it easier to set CST tax rates that best suit their economies facilitating the assessment for investment by domestic and foreign investors. The CTT system of taxation would inspire a culture of business economy and efficiency, provide incentive for individual savings and investments, ensure accounting transparency, minimise tax avoidance and promote competition for attracting foreign inward investment among the EU Member States.


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000