Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

CAP Reform Jun03

Last week, Europe's agriculture ministers met in Thessaloniki, Greece, to finalise reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. While I welcome the agreement as a positive step to overhauling the controversial system of European subsidy payment to farmers, it is a huge disappointment that governments caved in to pressure from the French and allowed them major concessions over the reform.

 

The current CAP gives Europe's farmers subsidies of £31bn a year, almost half the entire budget of the EU. This system will become unsustainable when the 10, mainly poor, rural countries join the EU next year unless drastic reforms can be implemented.

 

Under the new agreement, farm subsidies will be "de-coupled" so that farmers will receive a single payment, rather than receiving a sum in line with the amount of food produced. The existing system of payments has encouraged overproduction and caused a gross distortion in world markets. Sadly, instead of making de-coupling compulsory in each member state, last week's negotiations provided individual countries with a get-out clause, allowing them to continue with the old system if there is a risk that the new system would lead to the farm land being abandoned.

 

In doing so, the French have made a mockery of, and severely, weakened the proposed reforms, ensuring that the old principles of the Common Agricultural Policy will remain in place. Member States have also allowed the start date of reform to be delayed from 2005 to 2007.

 

By allowing France to opt out of de-coupling, the EU has missed the opportunity to end the costly, bureaucratic system of subsidies which has led to the over-production of certain goods for profit. In a free market economy, it is crucial that farmers are left to grow what the customer wants, not what pays the biggest subsidy. The new reforms will neither save the British taxpayer a single penny nor benefit the consumer who currently pays some of the highest food prices in the world.

 

Furthermore, the concessions to the French will mean European agriculture will continue to create vast food surpluses that will be dumped on poor countries. Europe has missed its chance to lead the world in encouraging fair trade and protecting poor farmers in developing countries. This will severely handicap the EU's negotiating hand at the next World Trade Organisation talks in September.

 

The British Government must implement the de-coupled payment system. This is the only way to end the bureaucratic nightmare for West Suffolk farmers of form-filling and red tape, and encourage them to get closer to the market place.

 


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000