Publications


 

  Home Contact Services Photos Publications

 

Columns and Letters  

Newsletters etc

 

2005

 

Scum in Paris

Dunes at Sunrise

Power of worldlings

Flu in Flight

Peace in the Middle East

Islam and European values

Poppy is Life and Death

Ethnicity, Religion and Citizens

Religion and Terrorists

Bumper to Bumper

Can the Tories Win?

Energy for the Poor

The EU works

Communicable Diseases

Asylum & Immigration

Euros for Oil

Letter to Howard

Fair Tax

East Meets West

Food for Thought

Luxury for Pets

No Smoke without Cash

Perfume not Poison

Reform Healthcare

Virtual Healthcare

Victims of Poverty

 

 

2004

 

Illiteracy

U-turn on Constitution

Diagnosis, disease, poverty

Europe of 25 nations

Subsidies

Athens Airport

A week in the life of an MEP

Expansion

Martin Bell

Battery Recycling

ACP-EU Joint Assembly

London and the EU

Martin Bell

Trading with the poor

Symbols & Religious Freedom

EU interference in aviation

Your MEP in Brussels

Peace in Rural East Anglia

Hajj

Living with Chemicals

Fair Share of Sugar

Old Cures

 

 

2003

 

Hallmarks

Europe needs Business

Espresso Victims

MEP numbers to fall

ID Cards

Cat and Dog Fur

British Hallmark

Killing for Dishonour

Conflict in Africa

British Ethnic Congress

Farmers' hardship

Church Repairs

North Sea Fishermen

Russian Oil in Euros

HIV/AIDS commission

Cat and Dog Fur

BNP Victory Shock

Rights for Disabled People

Hallmarks

Environment

Illegal immigration

Labour ignores rural economy

Sheep's Ear for EU

Gujaratis in politics

Muscle or machine energy

Out of fish

CAP Reform

Indians in Belgium

Parallel import of medicines

Rich pets in luxury

Euro - Not now but soon

In Europe, Not Run By Europe

The Future of Europe

India and the EU

Green Future for the Poor

Oil should be priced in Euros

Save local chemists

Cow Mountains

Glaxo cuts not enough

Animal Welfare in the EU

Britain and the Euro

Help for UK Farmers

Abandoned Cars

Food, not guns, for poor

EU will evolve

Ethiopia Aid

Ethiopia Famine  

Cyprus in the EU  

 

 

1999-2003

 

Fair wages for off-shore workers

Pharmaceuticals fail the Poor

Loss of UK jobs

Parliament accountable

India and China

Agency Workers Directive

EU immigration

Britain and the Euro

Indian Takeaway

Old Tyres

Future of EU

Preserve the Countryside

EU Waste and SMEs

Biodiesel

Renewable Energy

African Dictators

Stansted

Financial Reform of EU

Smoking

Kashmir

Fishing

Buying from the poor

End to Poverty

EU Must Reform

EU and poverty

Blackcurrant Farmers

Mobile Phones

India's Poor

India and terrorism

British Muslims visit Cairo

US offends Arabs

Reality of Islam in Europe

Animal Welfare

India's Potential

Terrorism

Letter from Brussels

AIDS report

Food Aid

Mauritania

Peterborough regeneration

Football Contracts and EC

Fuel tax

East-West rail link for Bedford

Europe

From Blackpool

 

Agency Workers Directive Nov02

In Strasbourg next week, the European Parliament will be voting on the controversial Agency Workers Directive - a proposal from the European Commission that threatens to introduce new legislation and therefore more red tape affecting thousands of temporary agency workers employed throughout the UK.

The contribution of agency workers to the UK workplace today, especially in the East of England, is greater than ever before. It is currently estimated that around 700,000 people are working as temporary agency workers at any one time in the UK, representing almost half the entire figure for agency workers across the EU.

In its current format, the Directive specifies that after a 6-week period a temporary worker could claim comparability with an 'equivalent' employee of the user enterprise doing the same or similar job for the purposes of 'basic pay and conditions'. This equal treatment would impose significant administrative burdens on both user companies and agencies, particularly small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

The impact could be devastating. SMEs are likely to reduce their use of temporary workers, putting an estimated 170,000 jobs at risk. Other companies, however, will be forced to carry the costs associated with equalisation, increasing the pressures on consumer prices and service delivery levels. Alternatively, they may decide to reduce the pay and benefits of permanent staff. There is also a fear that staff loyalty among permanent workers will decline due to the apparent improved status of temporary co-workers.

Behind the Agency Workers Directive is the suspicion that temporary workers are an exploited group in some areas of the EU. This is generally not the case in the UK. On the contrary, most temporary workers enjoy their work and feel that it is the key to the fulfilment of their long-term career and lifestyle. The present UK regulatory framework, which guarantees basic employment rights such as the national minimum wage, working time regulations and health and safety regulation, offers a clear balance between flexibility and protection for agency workers. This additional red tape from Brussels is not necessary!

Agency working is the key to competitive strength in our economy, and to an improving work/life balance for our workers. It offers a route back into work for those who have been out of the workforce through sickness, pregnancy etc, and a chance for many who would otherwise be excluded from the labour market. For many, it is a bridge to permanent employment, allowing new entrants and low skill workers to gain the necessary experience for a better job whilst they are earning.

In the East of England, we have many food processing firms, horticultural suppliers and farmers where the work is seasonal. Such employers rely on temporary workers to cope with their busy periods and would be seriously affected by the new regulations.

This Directive, if adopted in its current format could have a major negative impact on the flexibility of the UK labour market, be damaging to the UK economy, and restrict choice and opportunity for temporary workers, as well as increase the cost of labour for businesses. I will be voting to amend these proposals in Strasbourg to ensure that agency workers and their users in the Eastern Region are protected

 

 


2004

 

Issue 3/2004
Issue 2/2004

Issue 1/2004

 

 

2003


Issue 8/2003

Issue 7/2003

Issue 6/2003

Issue 5/2003

Issue 4/2003

Special Issue

Issue 3/2003

Issue 2/2003

Issue 1/2003

 

 

2002


Issue 9/2002

Issue 8/2002

Issue 7/2002
Issue 6/2002
Issue 5/2002
Issue 4/2002
Issue 3/ 2002
Issue 2/2002

Issue 1/2002

 

 

2001


Winter 2001

Autumn 2001

Summer 2001
February 2001

 

 

2000


December 2000
September 2000
June 2000